events_sidebar_calendar_header.gif


Polar Bear Plunge Pics
CLICK ON IMAGES TO VIEW THE GALLERY

community_header.jpg
visitors_guide.jpg
annual_manual.jpg
best_of_athens.jpg

SoA_Anews_ad.jpg


 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Editorial / Commentary /  Aaron Swartz: The life we lost and the day we fight back
. . . . . . .
Sunday, January 26,2014

Aaron Swartz: The life we lost and the day we fight back

Breaking the Sound Barrier

By Amy Goodman

PARK CITY, Utah - A year after Internet freedom activist Aaron Swartz's suicide at the age of 26, a film about this remarkable young man has premiered at the Sundance Film Festival. The film, titled "The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz," directed by Brian Knappenberger, follows the sadly short arc of Swartz's life. He committed suicide while under the crushing weight of unbending, zealous federal prosecutors, who had Swartz snatched off the street near the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, accusing him of computer crimes.

At the age of 14, Swartz helped develop RSS, "Really Simple Syndication," which changed how people get online content. He also co-founded Reddit, one of the Internet's most popular websites. In the year before his death, Swartz helped defeat a notorious bill before Congress, the Stop Online Piracy Act, which would have granted corporations sweeping powers of censorship over the Internet. Now, another fight for the freedom of the Internet has begun. This one will have to be waged without Swartz.

A coalition of Internet activists, technologists and policy experts are joining together on Feb. 11 for "The Day We Fight Back." As the coalition says on its website, reflecting on the victory against SOPA, "Today we face a different threat, one that undermines the Internet, and the notion that any of us live in a genuinely free society: mass surveillance. If Aaron were alive, he'd be on the front lines, fighting against a world in which governments observe, collect, and analyze our every digital action." Before Edward Snowden made "NSA" and "mass surveillance" household terms, Swartz was speaking out against the National Security Agency's bulk collection programs. His brother, Noah Swartz, told me, "I think Aaron's message that we can all take with us is that… we can see the change we want to see in the world by participating, rather than feeling helpless and useless."

Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephen P. Heymann and U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz brought the legal case that overwhelmed Aaron Swartz. When he was a fellow at Harvard University, Swartz went to nearby MIT, which allowed members of the public to use its computer network and access its resources, including the database of digitized academic research articles maintained by the nonprofit company JSTOR. He wrote a computer program that allowed a laptop to automatically download articles, and proceeded to download millions of them. JSTOR noticed and contacted MIT, and MIT in turn contacted the police.

The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act was enacted in 1986 to prosecute people engaged in credit-card fraud or threatening national security. Because Swartz, like any member of the public, had permission to use MIT's network, he was not committing fraud. Swartz felt that the academic articles represented a cultural commons that should be shared. JSTOR decided not to press charges. Yet the federal prosecutors went ahead anyway.

Aaron's father, Bob Swartz (who, ironically, is a consultant for the MIT Media Lab), said what followed was a "nearly sadistic prosecution." Aaron Swartz's attorney, Elliott Peters, told me, "Aaron wasn't a thief… He certainly downloaded more of JSTOR than they wanted, but it wasn't to steal anything." Swartz refused to accept a plea bargain, which would have made him a felon. He was facing 35 years in prison and a $1 million fine.

Bob Swartz is incensed at MIT, who, he said, "cooperated with the prosecutor. They provided the prosecutor evidence without a subpoena and a warrant. They violated any number of laws… They also refused to cooperate with us, give us evidence, and we had very significant difficulty even getting them to respond." Peters alleges prosecutorial misconduct, saying that Heymann withheld exculpatory evidence and more. Even now, a year after Aaron's death, Peters and the Swartz family are still trying to get all the documentation from federal prosecutors. They are also working with Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., to pass "Aaron's Law," which would reform the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to eliminate the overbroad language that gives prosecutors a license to charge trivial computer behavior as a felony.

In the meantime, Noah Swartz is actively organizing the Feb. 11 Day We Fight Back against mass surveillance. In a speech after the defeat of the SOPA bill, Aaron Swartz recounted the truly grass-roots, global nature of the protests. He left the crowd with this call to action: "If we let them persuade us we didn't actually make a difference, if we start seeing it as someone else's responsibility to do this work … then next time they might just win. Let's not let that happen." (c) 2014 Amy Goodman. Distributed by King Features Syndicate

Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.

Amy Goodman is the host of "Democracy Now!," a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 1,000 stations in North America. She is the co-author of "The Silenced Majority," a New York Times best-seller.

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 

 
 
Close
Close
Close