add_event_1.jpg

Photos_with_Santa_teaser.jpg

what_hap_signup_300x45.jpg

community_header.jpg
BG14_sidebar_96x96.jpgBOA14_sidebar_96x96.jpgVG14_sidebar_96x96.jpgobits_96x96.jpgAM14_sidebar_96x96.jpgannounce_96x96.jpg
soa13_300x45.jpg

MoralHazard_eyetear_teasebanner.jpg
shuffler_teaser_300x60.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Local NEWS /  Dems speak out against proposed ‘right-to-work’ measures
. . . . . . .
Sunday, June 9,2013

Dems speak out against proposed ‘right-to-work’ measures

By David DeWitt

State Rep. Debbie Phillips, a Democrat from Albany, has joined others in her party in slamming so-called "right to work" legislation that Ohio Republicans want to bring to the ballot box.

Two "right-to-work" bills introduced by state Rep. Kristina Roegner, R-Hudson, had their first hearings last week in the Ohio House's Manufacturing and Workforce Development Committee.

A third "right-to-work" bill has been introduced by state Rep. Ron Maag, R-Lebanon, and has not yet received a public hearing. The legislation would essentially prohibit public employers from requiring workers to join a union or pay dues.

Roegner has another bill that would extend that to private employees and a proposal to ask voters whether to put a "right-to-work" clause in the state Constitution.

Phillips, in a release, said that the legislation would attack workers' rights to collectively bargain in the private sector. She also slammed the version proposing a state Constitutional amendment.

"Ohioans rejected Governor Kasich's attack on the middle class by voting down (Senate Bill 5), yet House Republicans seem to have missed the point and continue to push unsafe, unfair and divisive policies," Phillips said. "We need to stand together and demand an end to these attacks."

In her release, she said that workers in states with "right-to-work" laws have lower wages, with an average household income $6,437 less per year and less safe workplaces, with 36 percent more workplace fatalities.

State Rep. Armond Budish, D-Beachwood, who recently finished a stint as House Speaker and then Minority Leader, said "extremist Republicans" are ignoring the will of the overwhelming majority of Ohioans who rejected S.B. 5.

"Democrats stood with our hardworking brothers and sisters and fought off the attacks on workers' rights then and we are prepared to do so again," he said. "We will work to ensure Ohio does not become the next casualty on the growing list of states that have rammed through so-called 'right to work' legislation in the dead of the night."

This last line is a reference to similar legislation being proposed and in some cases passed in states such as Michigan, Missouri, Pennsylvania and now Ohio.

Most of these efforts are tied to an entity known as the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, a right-wing public-private partnership non-profit organization that creates draft legislation and works toward passing it through various state legislatures as part of the Republican "Red state model" effort.

Ohio Senate President Keith Faber, R-Celina, has said that the "right-to-work" legislation is not on his caucus' agenda.

"After discussions with other leaders and my caucus, I don't believe there is current support for this issue in the General Assembly," he said in a statement at the beginning of May. "The only purpose this discussion serves right now is to generate a bunch of breathless fundraising appeals from the Ohio Democratic Party."

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

Let the people decide. Put it on the ballot.

 

b
Remember the "Building a Better Ohio' ads that perverted the 'We are Ohio' grandmothers quotes. Remember how quickly that backfired on them? Here's a link, http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2011/10/11/340601/group-splices-grandma-labor/

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

Actually, employees are not required to "join" unions; they are simply required to pay a portion of the cost for representation. 


What do they get for the money?  They get increased pay and benefits, better working conditions, workload protections, safety protections, and other rights that are negiated for on behalf of the entire bargaining unit.  Even those members of the bargaining unit who don't want to be union members reap the benefits of the negotiations - and they should have to contribute to the cost!

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

terry, I get it... sometimes these comment threads get out of controll. Heck, I am one of the people that comments often.  But if you are just going to delete almost everything posted, why not just disable the ability to comment and save everyone time 



Editor's note: Until we can get a handle on how to block commenters who abuse the privilege of participating in this forum, we will have to delete comments individually and manually. Sometimes, this means deleting a thread if deleting one person's comments renders the conversation incomprehensible. Sorry about that. One commenter in particular has been warned repeatedly to behave himself; he has refused, and is no longer welcome to comment here. TS

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

thank you for the reply

 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close