events_sidebar_calendar_header.gif

add_event_1.jpg

what_hap_signup_300x45.jpg

community_header.jpg
bg_13_96x96.jpgboa_13_96x96.jpgvg13_96x96.jpgobits_96x96.jpgam13_96x96.jpgannounce_96x96.jpg
SoA12_300x60.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Local NEWS /  WOUB panel explores ins, outs, pros, cons of fracking
. . . . . . .
Wednesday, February 29,2012

WOUB panel explores ins, outs, pros, cons of fracking

By Charlotte O’Malley
Bissell_FrackingDebate_001
Photo Credits: Joel Bissell
Photo Caption: A panel discussion on hydraulic fracturing Tuesday evening in a WOUB TV studio in Athens featured an energetic and informative discussion on the controversial oil and gas drilling technique. The panel included, from left, professor Robert Chase of Marietta College, Terry Fleming, director of the Ohio Petroleum Council, OU professor Natalie Kruse and OU professor Bernhard Debatin. Chase and Fleming defended fracking, while Kruse and Debatin raised concerns about it.

WOUB's live panel discussion on fracking, "Newswatch In-Depth: Fracking Frenzy," aired Tuesday evening, providing a forum for southeast Ohio to ask questions or join the discussion via phone calls, emails, tweets, or Facebook messages.

Tim Sharp, news director of WOUB, and Athens NEWS Editor Terry Smith served as moderators for the panel discussion, which featured four experts and/or advocates on different sides of the controversial issue.

Representing the pro-fracking side were Terry Fleming, executive director of the Ohio Petroleum Council, and Robert W. Chase, professor and chair of the Department of Petroleum Engineering and Geology at Marietta College. Representing the other side of the issue were Natalie Kruse, an assistant professor of environmental studies at Ohio University, and Bernhard Debatin, a professor of journalism and representative of  "Slow Down Fracking in Athens County," a citizens group.

People who support oil and gas development in Athens County and the surrounding region argue that a local boom in fracking will greatly benefit the economically depressed region economically.

Fleming discussed this aspect of the issue at length.

"It's one of the best things to happen to the state of Ohio, maybe ever," he declared. "Having grown up in Appalachia — I grew in Marietta…, the exciting thing for me is it happening in a part of the state that needs it the worst, a part of the state that's been in despair, high unemployment, hopelessness," Fleming said. "Now there is an opportunity not just in the oil field but in the auxiliary jobs that are created. The jobs that are going to be created not just at the oil patch but as a result of this are going to be a real economic boom to a part of the state that is long overdue."

On the other side of the issue, however, fracking skeptics, both in emails and calls and on the WOUB panel, raised concerns about fracking operations contaminating groundwater and how that could cripple the burgeoning local foods movement in Athens County and elsewhere.

More than 230 people from Athens and other counties in the areas recently signed a letter to the Athens County Commissioners, asking them to protect local land, air and water from the possible negative impacts of fracking.

Kruse acknowledged that no matter what anybody says, some level of hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas is likely on the horizon for our area. "I'm not na ve enough to think that this isn't going to happen," she said, "but just like every other industrial process, there are environmental and health risks, and by denying them or glossing over them, we're doing a disservice to Ohio and to Appalachian Ohio."

Throughout the show, people called and emailed in various questions, pertaining to such issues as the degree of local impact from fracking for farmers and the risks of water contamination.

Kruse addressed the importance of residents in the area to test their water before any drilling can happen.

"We're actually working with local farmers doing baseline testing on their water, because ultimately, there is a risk of water contamination either due to surface spills or poor casings of wells, and those industries are reliant on fresh clean water, and it is a basis of a lot of the economy in the area," Kruse said. "And I think one of the most important things people can do is know the quality of the water they have now, and know the quality of the water that they're putting into these amazing organic local farms now, so if there's a change they can figure out why that is and try to mitigate that problem."

Fleming, however, dismissed the possibility of water contamination from deep-shale fracking.

"If the casings are done wrong or you have a bad operator at the top [maybe], but from the actual process, it is absolutely impossible to contaminate the ground water (as a result of deep underground hydraulic fraturing). Impossible, scientifically impossible. Can't happen," Fleming said.

He repeated his insistence on the low-risk impact of fracking when he said the chances of him getting into an automobile accident after leaving the meeting were much higher than any risks we face with fracking. He also noted that a Kings Island water ride uses more water than a typical fracking operation (though Kruse lasted noted that typically that water is recycled over and over again, and isn't tainted by chemicals).

Chase of Marietta College offered some advice, however, that seemed to suggest that water contamination may happen more often than what Fleming was stating. He advised landowners to work with a competent oil attorney and to get a lease that gives them protective measures "like ensuring their water is tested by an independent party before anything is done, then test[ing] it again after a well is drilled, and then monitor[ing] it." That way, if they see any changes that cause them problems, they can "sue," he added.

Professor Debatin's, to some extent, took a macro perspective on hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas. He maintained that the industrial process itself is a perfect example of why the United States needs to revamp its energy policies.

"America is far behind many other countries," he argued. "We are making a big mistake by keeping burning fossil fuels as if they are there forever. And I see that the fracking frenzy that we are having in this country is just another way not to deal with a really, really urgent problem.

"… Fracking as it is being practiced here is very dangerous and it is a short-lived activity. The jobs that are created — typical for extractive industries by the way — are short-lived, often jobs that are not going to the local people. They are mostly even going to out-of-state people, and in the end we are in a situation where a very beautiful area that we have here is turned into an industrial area, and people who live here will have a very hard time making a living once the industry disappears."

ASKED WHAT ABOUT THE AREA'S geology would lead drillers to think the area has potential for large-scale oil and gas development, Fleming responded, "Until you dig a hole, you don't know what's there, so when everyone is excited and looking at the economic benefits, anybody in the industry will tell you that until you dig a hole, you won't know what's there," Fleming said. "The Utica shale is in 82 of the 88 counties, but whether it's there in amounts to be economically recoverable or not, we don't know until we dig a hole."

Smith asked the panelists about the huge divide between pro- and anti- sides in the fracking debate, where the former insist that groundwater has never been contaminated by fracking, and the latter suggest that it's unavoidable.

"There is sort of a semantic trick going on here," Debatin said. "Fracking is not just what happens 7,000 feet underneath the surface; it's an industrial process. And we've had this before. We had the coal boom here, and it went from boom to bust. People were left alone, nobody cared, and the industry just disappeared when they had taken out what they wanted to take out."

To watch an archive video copy of the program, visit WOUB's website at http://woub.org/fracking.

The panel discussion and program were part of a cooperative effort to highlight the regional fracking issue by WOUB, The Athens NEWS and the Marietta Times. The news outlets' recent coverage of the issue have been aggregated on a "Flare Code" site that can be accessed with a smart-phone. The code is located on this printed page or web page.

The site was built with help from an OU student-developed company, Flare Code.

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

Was a little disappointed with Terry. 

I thought that after one good question early on, he just was not aggressive at all.

Maybe it was because of the different medium, but I had high hopes for some pointed questioning aimed at Fleming and Chase.

I mean, Fleming had two outright lies quoted just in this article...

Also disappointed with Kruse.  Seemed somewhat timid in response.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

Believe me, I wanted to ask follow-ups but the format really didn't permit that. It was basically ask one question, get an answer, and then they'd move on to the next question. I thought Natalie Kruse did fine; she wasn't trying to hold down one side of the argument, but rather just give factual information that bolsters the idea that fracking needs to be forcefully regulated. And apologies for the incorrect caption information (saying Bob Chase was from Hocking rather than Marietta college. That has been fixed). TS

 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close