whats_happening_qr.jpg

events_sidebar_calendar_header.gif




community_header.jpg
visitors_guide.jpg
annual_manual.jpg
best_of_athens_1.jpg
lodging_guide.jpg
bridal_guide_1.jpg
announcements_1.jpg

SoA_Anews_ad.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Editorial / Letters /  Don’t mix up religious disputes with practical health-care insurance issue
. . . . . . .
Sunday, February 19,2012

Don’t mix up religious disputes with practical health-care insurance issue

To the Editor:

In response to Ms. Carol Costanzo's letter, regarding the recent birth control controversy and the Catholic Church:

The idea that anyone could be upset with the current proposed standards within the recent health care reform is absurd. Despite what you may have read or heard, exceptions have been made for religious institutions who feel that it is immoral to provide coverage for reproductive health. For those entities, the health insurance companies will be the ones footing the bill on all reproductive health care.

Additionally, there's a difference between being forced to utilize a specific service, such as a religious institution, and providing the option of utilizing the service to said entity's one-million-plus employees – many of whom may need these services, despite the church's stance.

Also, to the best of my knowledge, religion is supposed to be a personal matter. So why is it that we don't just trust that each employee will do what is right by God and provide the care for all others?

Finally, I want point out that (while this may not have occurred to you) the Catholic Church employs many individuals of other faiths, and some who are affiliated with no religion at all. How can you justify allowing the largest single religious denomination in the country to deny something as basic as reproductive health care to its employees? After all, it's not as if they can't afford it, even if they were forced to pay for the option.

To quote Jon Stewart, "You've confused the 'war on religion' with not always getting what you want."

David Curry
Nelsonville

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

I'VE HAD ENOUGH! In this Holy War on Religion, of Religion, and by Religion - I SURRENDER! ‘Cause I’m a lover, not a fighter.  Instead...I’m gonna start my OWN religion, and get in on the good stuff: tax exemptions, and lots of taxpayer money to do what I want, in the name of religious liberty. AWESOME! 

Hey NEWT -wanna join? We’re gonna have open marriages and multiple wives and all SORTS of neat stuff that you’re just gonna love! But don’t you worry Newt: we’ll have no - I repeat - NO nasty stoning of adulterers in OUR religion. None of that stuff. I Promise! As for SANTORUM, he just LOVES to tell other people how they should live. He’ll make us a REAL fine preacher-man. In fact, if he joins we’ll make him Saint Santorum....AND fix his Google search results! As for Mr. Obama, it’s obvious that we’ll need to (severely) demonize him, even further than now!  Last but not least: MITT and RON. Hmmm... Hey, I know. Just for you two guys and the rest of the 1%: we’ll insist on NO TAXES AT ALL for our members…AND human sacrifice of illegal aliens. Tear out their hearts! Televise it live! WHAT A COUNTRY!  :-)

By the way, the fact that Mitt Romney’s DAD was born in Mexico is quite relevant here. The reason is that Mitt’s Mormon GRAND-dad LEFT the United States and went to Mexico in the 1880‘s because  laws against polygamy were passed in the U.S.; And being a Mormon back then, Mitt’s grand-dad just wanted to keep his multiple wives. Hey, who wouldn’t? Therefore, IF we follow the “logic” of the people crying crocodile tears about a non-existent “war on religion”, THEN the U.S. should have allowed polygamy back then (and religious racial discrimination, and who knows what else) - just because a particular religion claimed it as their cherished belief. GIVE ME A BREAK! Or better yet... give me a TAX-break...for my new religion!

Seriously: The bottom line is that absolutely NO ONE is coming into our Churches or places of worship and telling believers what to believe.....or forcing them to use contraception. BUT If the Bishops (and other denominations) want to continue running businesses outside of their places of worship...businesses that employ millions of people of varying faiths -or no "faith" at all- THEN they must play by the same rules and rights that other workers live by and enjoy (especially if their businesses use our tax dollars, and skip paying taxes, in the process). This is not a “war on religion”. Never was. It’s a war BY some religions... on women and men who simply want to plan their families, to control their futures, to keep their jobs, and to have health insurance that allows them to do that. The churches (or the IRS) need to decide whether these are gonna be political organizations proclaiming partisan politics from the pulpit...or....tax-exempt places of WORSHIP.  Not both. 

p. s. I come from a religious background. I know that their are many good people out there in various faiths (AND outside of those faiths)...many good people searching for answers, searching for community, searching for a way....in this all-too-harsh world. There's only one thing I can say to you: think for yourself, be yourself, trust yourself. Don't just accept something because it comes from a "voice of authority". For ultimately YOU are responsible for your life, and how you try to live it. That’s why you have a conscience: to choose, not just to follow....

 

 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close