whats_happening_qr.jpg

events_sidebar_calendar_header.gif




community_header.jpg
visitors_guide.jpg
annual_manual.jpg
best_of_athens_1.jpg
lodging_guide.jpg
bridal_guide_1.jpg
announcements_1.jpg

SoA_Anews_ad.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Editorial / Wearing Thin /  And you thought you’d heard the last about fracking
. . . . . . .
Wednesday, February 8,2012

And you thought you’d heard the last about fracking

By Terry Smith

It's been two or three weeks since I've weighed in on fracking so here's a few disparate points to consider:

• First of all, my basic position is unchanged. I don't think fracking (the horizontal drilling variety), if it actually happens in Athens County to any great degree, will be as bad as opponents make it out to be, nor as wonderful as supporters predict. Both sides are prone to almost pathologically selective data filtering, only collecting and considering information that supports their points of few, and then magnifying its significance. (I had one well-meaning letter-writer a couple months ago suggest that the adverse effects on water supplies from drilling one fracking well could be felt in a 200-mile radius, which is  basically the whole state of Ohio and a good part of Indiana.)

But I'd be guilty of the same thing if I tried to predict what's going to happen with fracking in this area. My gut feeling tells me that Athens County, as a result of its less-than-ideal geology, won't see the boom that's happening either in east Ohio or out West. Unfortunately, my "gut" – while embarassingly substantial – is wrong quite often.

• It would be nice if Cunningham Energy, the Charleston, W.Va.-based company that made a major splash in Athens County late last fall, buying up oil and gas leases for much of the county, would follow up and actually tell the people of this area what they're doing. Since early December, Cunningham has clammed up almost completely, and its officials have declined to discuss why, for instance, they haven't followed their previously announced timeline for filing drilling permit applications with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources.

On Nov. 29, Cunningham landman Joe Blackhurst told The Athens NEWS that the company expected to file its permit applications in "30 to 45 days"; that the state would take "between a few weeks and a few months" to process those applications; and that the company expected drilling by "early spring." Now, nearly a month after that "45 days" would have expired, no drilling permit applications have been filed.

Why is this? What's the delay? No venture partner yet?

Many, many local people have a direct and substantial interest in whatever Cunningham intends to do with all these leases. March 15 is the drop-dead date for most of its leases (and signing bonuses and royalties). This small company holds the future of our county in its hands. The continued refusal to talk about their plans is irresponsible, and raises hard questions about this company's intentions. It also doesn't do anything to refute the widely held suspicion that Cunningham intends at some point to "flip" all its southeast Ohio leases to one of the bigger players in the gas and oil racket.

• It would also be a good thing if we started getting more pro-fracking opinions in the paper. Letter and Reader's Forum submissions to this newspaper have been 95 percent anti-fracking. I'd feel the same way if we were getting all opinions in support of horizontal hydraulic fracturing. The decided tilt toward opposition opinion, I suspect, isn't a reflection of overwhelming opposition in the county. I think it's more a matter of people who support fracking being afraid to expose themselves to anger and scorn. To be blunt, local fracking supporters need to grow a pair. (Well, good news, after I wrote this, we received a pro-fracking opinion. It's on page 6 of today's paper, and almost assuredly will unleash a renewed flood of anti-fracking opinions. But please, people, you'll have a much better shot of getting your opinions in the paper if you write regular-length letters.)

• It's encouraging to see proposals for greater taxation and regulation of the oil and gas industry getting some traction at the state level. This has been my position all along – that this industry stands to profit fabulously from shale-bed development. But they need to compensate communities for any damage they cause, and abide by strict regulations on where and how they drill for gas and oil and dispose of drilling wastewater. If taxes and regulations start discouraging oil and gas development in the east Ohio fracking fields, we can revisit these issues. But I doubt that will happen; the alacrity at which oil and gas outfits are gobbling up mineral rights – and the unprecedented piles of money they're willing to pay for them – suggests it will take an awful lot of taxes and regulation to discourage these people.

• Increasingly, fracking opponents are condemning area landowners who have signed leases turning over their mineral rights to oil and gas companies. They're painting them as greedy, money-grubbing Snidely Whiplashes. This is unfair. I know a number of landowners, who after intensive research and soul-searching, came to the conclusion that the benefits of signing a lease, to their families, outweighed the potential risks.

In most cases, these people didn't make a decision after calculating that all that money was well worth destroying their and their neighbors' water and land. Rather, they studied the available information, and came to a different conclusion than fracking opponents about what's likely to happen if they lease their land for oil and gas development.

They simply disagree that fracking will ruin the county's natural resources or food-based economy.

And some leasing landowners see this as an opportunity to crawl out from under heavy debt, to pay off medical bills, credit card debt or college loans, or to leave something for their kids. To describe these people as "greedy," or to suggest primly that "money isn't everything," is just obnoxious.

On the other hand, I will grant that if you truly believe fracking will destroy our county's natural resources and the businesses that depend upon them, then it's entirely consistent to be angry at your neighbors and fellow community members who will hasten that result by leasing their property.

This is wishy-washy on my part for sure, but I have a natural reflex to do the "on the one hand/on the other hand" dance when I see friends and neighbors going at each other's throats. Granted, this attitude probably would have gotten me strung up in pre-Civil War Kansas and Missouri.

• I'm also tired of hearing the conventional anti-fracking wisdom that oil and gas drilling doesn't translate into economic development. In just the past week, two proposals have been aired for huge chemical plants directly related to fracking, employing thousands of local people in the Ohio Valley, West Virginia and western Pennsylvania.

Other industries that hope to exploit the shale-oil and gas boom are building factories and industrial facilities throughout the region.

You may have a problem with traditional industry, the sorts of places that make the plastic that every one of us uses every day of our lives, but don't tell me it doesn't benefit people economically, or that this type of industry hasn't sustained families and communities in the Ohio Valley for many decades.

Thankfully, we're developing clean energy options that eventually will supplant these traditional "dirty" industries, but until the renewable industries – with ample government support – can support jobs for many more people, people in the Rust Belt have to work somewhere to provide for their families and communities.

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

Sure on some level, there is some justice in your words.  However, as a antifracking person, here are a few things I know will happen.

1.  Some private citizens and communities will have their water negatively impacted in a BIG WAY.  Sure that those who don't have their water negatively impacted will believe industry hype and propaganda about just how safe fracking is. 

Question is, what about those communities who do hve their water negatively impacted?  We have already seen that the Natural Gas industry is quick to run away from their responsibility to make people whole when BAD THINGS HAPPEN.

2.  We know that some people will suffer great impacts to their individual and community way of life if fracking comes to town. 

Curious here...just what do you see as a fair price for small rural communities in Ohio and elsewhere to pay in the name of a "National Energy Policy"?  If property values go down, who is going to make those people whole, or is it your contention that those lost property values are something WE JUST HAVE TO EAT in the name of the greater societal good?

3.  We know that some people, and some communities are going to suffer various and assorted health problems as a result of fracking. Should those who suffer those ill health effects be COMPENSATED? If so, who pays for it...the taxpayer, or the Natural Gas industry, or are you again going to say that is just the cost of progress, the cost we as individuals have to pay for the greater societal good?

4.  The government and the natural gas industry know that some cases of cancer will be caused in communities where fracking takes place, they know that some people will die from those cancers.  Under the basic precepts of ALARA, the government and industry want to tell us those risks are within acceptable risks...BUT...what if you are one of those people who dies from one of those cancers, or what if one of your family members is one of those people.    Are you going to just BUCK IT UP?

None of this is HYPE...these are known facts on both sides of the coin.  Problem is, the federal government, big business and the Natural Gas industry want us to accept these risks as a part of them doing business as usual, and they want us to be the ones that absorb these costs, want us to accept that we will NEVER BE MADE WHOLE if we are one of those ones, or one of those communities where things DO GO WRONG, and trust me, they will go wrong.

Sherwood Martinelli

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

i'm posting this for Bob Sheak, who tried but failed to make our wonderful comment system work. TS, Wearing Thin guy

I agree with everything Sherwood Martinelli writes. Further, there is more and more evidence, scientific and from a multitude of sources, that fracking has many awful effects on people, habitats, and animals who are in the vicinity of such mining operations. Fracking for me represents one of the last and dangerous gambits of the fossil fuel industries to keep citizens limited to the present energy system. I worry about the immediate effects of fracking - and mountaintop removal, and tar sands and related pipelines, and offshore oil drilling in the arctic and all over the planet. But I also worry about the accumulated effects of all this on the destruction of habitats and how they compound accelerating disastrous climate disruptions. This is the larger picture I see.

Having said all this, I think that Terry has a reasonable point of view with respect to what may or may not happen in Athens County. For example, his point that the gas/oil companies may not go ahead with mining operations is reasonable. Gas prices are low at the moment. The Liquified natural gas facilities and associated pipelines are not adquate on the East Coast to ramp up exports.

But Terry goes over-board when he refers to both sides as "pathological." I don't think he's being demeaning or vicious in this comment, just an expression of frustration with the lack of closure.

My side, the opposition to fracking, is being rational in expecting that fracking comes with many risks and ill effects as documented in many other states where fracking has been going on for awhile. So why not in Athens too. We're not making it all up. And harmful environmental and health effects may come together with financial windfalls for some lessors.

Additionally, neither side really knows how many Athenians support or oppose fracking. But there is no doubt that those openly and actively opposed to fracking overshadow those who have openly and actively favored it.

Finally, I think that Terry appreciates all this and does his best not to be taken in by either side until there is even additional evidence - e.g., some actual drilling. Indeed, the evidence is still not as substantial as, say, in the scientific case of global warming. But how often is it that policies are made when all the evidence is in?

As I emailed to some friends, the opposition to fracking reflected a bit of democracy and a vision of another way. And It's commendable to be proactive in such an open-ended situation.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

I might not have made it clear. Bob Sheak wrote the above comment, and I posted it for him. TS

 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close