whats_happening_qr.jpg

events_sidebar_calendar_header.gif




community_header.jpg
visitors_guide.jpg
annual_manual.jpg
best_of_athens_1.jpg
lodging_guide.jpg
bridal_guide_1.jpg
announcements_1.jpg

SoA_Anews_ad.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Editorial / Letters /  Punitive taxes on the rich will result in fewer jobs for everyone
. . . . . . .
Wednesday, April 20,2011

Punitive taxes on the rich will result in fewer jobs for everyone

To the Editor:

So nice to see that The Athens NEWS is carrying water for the Obama Administration's "blame the rich" campaign in the cover article on Monday. I guess it helps divert attention away from the most disastrous presidency in U.S. history. The only problem is that taxing "the rich" doesn't work. Here's why.


The reality is that a tax on "the rich" means a tax on everyone. Even if you taxed every "rich" person at 100 percent, it wouldn't be enough revenue for the government, or any government. So, eventually taxes get raised on the middle class and poor directly, or in most cases, indirectly. This is why tax-happy states like those in Europe are always raising taxes. That is why it costs so much to have a drink, or a smoke, or fill your tank, buy something (VAT taxes), or even start a business.

Higher taxes on "the rich" also mean more jobs being pushed overseas, which means more unemployment. "The rich" is the only class that creates jobs. Government doesn't create jobs; it just shifts public money around. Therefore, the higher the tax rates for this job-creating class the more they're going to look for loopholes, the more they're going to move overseas, the more they're going to NOT pay their "fair share".

Assuming that "the rich" are an evil we have to live with, does it make sense to tax them into moving jobs and revenue overseas? Does it make sense to kill even more jobs with a punitive tax rate? Does it make sense to punish the poor through unemployment and more expensive goods? To the Left it does. Why? Because government is their answer to everything, their god, and to have you more dependent on Big Brother and not yourself is their idea of Utopia. Not only is it un-American, it doesn't work.

James Yerian
Radford Road
Athens

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
b

James,

You didn't just sip the kool-aid, you guzzled the whole pitcher. You make outlandish claims, but as long as the middle class can afford to buy liesure goods, corporations will sell them here. To lower the wages of the working class to third world levels will eventually, even hurt the wealthy.

 

But, hey, they have their money to cushion the blow.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

Dude, do you know how to read?  The middle class won't be able to afford anything b/c they won't have jobs.  Because the rich will not hire them.  There will be two classes: the poor, entirely dependent on the state, and the "rich", those that are left, that pay them.  It is logic, not "outlandish" claims.  Thanks for identifying yourself too :-)

 

b
James, Your arguments are weak, and I didn't leave my name because I'm familiar with your home harassment of those who do. You just keep serving your rich masters, and maybe they'll leave you a couple of scraps.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

Serious poposals to raise taxes for the top tax brackets are just an effort to make sure that any deficit-reduction plan balances sacrifice between all classes of wealth, including those who are the most equipped to pay more. If services and entitlements for middle- and lower-income people are reduced (or their taxes raised locally), taxes on high-end people should be increased. No credible deficit hawk will argue that deficit reduction can happen purely on the spending side, without huge repercussions for ordinary people. When Republicans preen about being the only ones serious about cutting the deficit, but then refuse to consider tax hikes, they're just as big of hypocrites as Democrats who pay lip service to deficit reduction while not supporting any serious cuts in spending.

As for tax hikes for the wealthy dampening investment that creates jobs, our economy has produced jobs at a healthy rate during many periods when high-end taxes were much higher than they are now. I suggest you re-read the article you were commenting on, before asking someone else to re-read your own letter.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

James, that dog won't hunt.  Trickle down economic theory is just that a theory that has been proven time and again to be junk economics.

 

Do your history, Terry. For most of the time that we had high tax rates and our economy boomed, the US economy was the only game in town. We had Europe rebuilding from two wars, and we had the USSR and China in a failed communist economy. The US boom would have been much higher without the 95% tax rates on the rich. Now, since capitalism is the norm, and the world realizes that taxes make the rich go away, companies in the US have options. They don't have to play on our court, they can play on China's. And they do. GE was able to shield half of its profits from US taxes because it made money overseas. When this golden age of taxation for liberals existed, there was no way out for "the rich". Now there is. And if they have to "pay their fair share", which is code for class warfare, they will either quit, or move all the jobs overseas. Because they can. So I'm still right, you're still wrong, and we're all happy.

 

James, I don't think you need to go back to the Cold War to find a period when tax rates for the rich are higher than they are now. Go back to Reagan's presidency. (And still with the 95 percent? WTF?) But I will grant you that a good case can be made for keeping corporate rates low, as argued in this column by economic columnist Robert Samuelson in a recent piece: http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/editorials/stories/2011/04/06/in-spite-of-ge-u-s--should-lower-corporate-taxes.html?sid=101

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT

Raising taxes on the rich so this administration can keep spending money like drunken sailors and selling America to China, smart, very smart. The only reason for raising taxes on the rich is so that more people can live off the Government thus creating more votes for the libs. How much money did you libs pay in taxes last year? What was your percentage? Mine was 28%. The fact is most of you don't pay taxes at all; it is time you pay your fair share. Socialism has never worked; just ask Cambodia how worked out for them.

 

 

 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close