![]() |
One issue with Ohio changing its law to permit 18-year-olds to drink alcohol is overcrowding. Most of the bars uptown are already very small and at least half the size of bars on High Street at Ohio State University. On any weekend night, groups of partygoers line up outside of the bars' doors waiting to get inside. The lines typically consist of 21-year-olds and older people with the occasional underage person using a fake ID; allowing 18-to 20-year-olds to drink will only overcrowd the bars more than they are already.
Overcrowding isn't limited to what you see on the outside of the bars once inside, the bar is a swaying crowd of people desperately trying to get drinks, go to the bathroom, find their lost girlfriend, or leave for another bar. If the legal drinking age were 18, waiting for an available bartender to take the drink order would seem like forever. It probably would be forever with an increase in people going uptown to drink. Bathroom lines would be never ending, especially the women's stalls. Forget games like darts and pool; not only would the waiting lists be 20 people long, there wouldn't be any space to play them.
Changing the drinking age to 18 brings up another issue whether most 18-year-olds are even mature enough to handle legally drinking. People usually turn 18 their senior year of high school or early in their freshman year at college. At that point in their lives, they're already going through new adventures graduation, living away from home and everything that goes along with college. By the time people turn 21, they have matured substantially, just through various life expenses along with oncoming graduation and the job market.
As a result of not being as mature as most 21-year-olds, letting 18-year-olds legally drink probably will increase the number of drunken-driving arrests. At that age, some people don't realize the consequences of getting behind the wheel even after they've had a couple drinks. Driving from Pawpurr's Bar to Martzholf Hall on South Green isn't as easy as it seems after throwing a few brews back. Aside from arrests, drunken-driving accidents may also increase, which is dangerous for everyone.
If the state of Ohio changed the drinking law age from 21 to 18, there would not only be an inconvenience for others out bar-hopping but it could potentially be dangerous.
Your arguing about overcrowding mainly which doesnt make sense because the bars are always over crowded and people go somewhere less crowded if needed..I think the age should be lowered..Because at 18 you can go to war for your country and die..at 18 you can and will be charged as an adult for a crime. Maybe you should do some research on countries that have lower drinking age...ex Canada. Their rate of alcohol deaths from 17-21 are MUCH LOWER THAN THE US...even Europe which has a drinking age of 16..
I agree this articel contains one of the dumbest "journalistic" argumentation I ever have seen. Dear Megan, if you were to write your script in a course essay, let me tell you YOU HAVE FAILED with a grade of F-
I have to agree with both of the above comments
Wow, what an incredibly immature argument. The drinking age shouldn't be lowered because the bars would be too crowded? How is that a bigger deal than the HUGE health risks of young people drinking? What about the national studies that prove a link between drinking from a young age and alcoholism? Not to mention, the lowering the bar to 18 would put alcohol in the hands of high school students, thusly making it easily obtainable by youth well under the age of 18. Also, you state lowering the drinking age could be potentially dangerous because of more drunk drivers on the road. Drunk driving IS dangerous and can be deadly. And let’s also not forget that federal highway funding would be cut from our state if the drinking age were lowered.
This is one of the shallowest things I have ever read. You should be ashamed of yourself.