Photo Caption: Cheap Tobacco, located on East State Street, is catching some heat for its cigarette rolling machine.
![]() |
Kelly Barnes, manager of the Cheap Tobacco store on East State Street, confirmed that on Saturday, the store got an e-mail from federal regulators, ordering that it cease operations of its in-store rolling machine. The federal agency regulating tobacco sales is the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau.
"All we know is, we got an e-mail 15 minutes before we closed on Saturday, saying they passed a law," Barnes recalled. She would not provide a copy of the communication to The Athens NEWS, but said the gist of it was that it is now illegal to provide the use of a roll-your-own machine to customers.
"Only thing I know right at the moment is, we do have lobbyists in Washington, D.C., lobbying for us, and our attorneys are filing an appeal," Barnes said.
The Cheap Tobacco chain of stores has locations in Ohio and West Virginia, according to its website.
In the two or three months of operating the machine before being ordered to shut it down, Barnes said, "we got a lot of business on it." She noted that the price difference between buying loose tobacco and rolling it, and buying a pack of cigarettes, is huge.
"If you roll your own, we have figured it up, it's a little over a dollar a pack," she said. She compared this to a well-known brand of pre-rolled cigarettes that costs more than $5 a pack.
Barnes said the store has been given a phone number to file any complaints about the order. She said she considers the mandate excessive interference in her business.
"In my opinion, they've taken away enough of our rights," she declared.
A man from The Plains said he had been planning to open his own tobacco store in that community, and had even rented a storefront, when he heard about the federal mandate. He said under the new legal circumstances, he doubts he'll be able to go ahead with the planned business venture.
"There's a federal law against manufacturing cigarettes," claimed Wayne Savage. "And only the big tobacco companies are allowed to do that."
Savage, a smoker himself, said the change mostly impacts the poor. "Because of all the high taxes (on tobacco), poor people have been switching to the roll-your-own cigarettes," he said. However, he added, doing it by hand, "to roll cigarettes for yourself takes an hour a day." That's why machines like the one that had been available in Cheap Tobacco have become "extremely popular," he said.
"Oh, (this change) is definitely hurting lower-income people," Savage added.
Tom Hogue, spokesman for the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, said there has been no new legislation on the issue, but after the agency became aware that cigarette-rolling machines like the one in Cheap Tobacco were coming into wide use, it reviewed the issue and decided to issue a ruling Sept. 30.
"It isn't that there's been a (legal) change," Hogue explained. "We basically put out a ruling that says, if you're engaged in this sort of activity, you're doing manufacturing under the definition of a manufacturer in the Internal Revenue code... It had reached a level where we had to say something about it."
According to the ruling, retailers offering customers the use of a rolling machine will have to meet Internal Revenue permitting requirements, obtain a bond, comply with record-keeping, reporting and inventory requirements, and pay tax on the rolled cigarettes.
Doug Kennedy, editor of the Oregon-based Roll Your Own magazine, said Wednesday he was rather surprised that authorities didn't act against the commercial use of the rolling machine in Ohio earlier, given that the state of Connecticut filed suit over its use about a year ago, the company that manufactures the device is based in Ohio, and it is most commonly used in Ohio and Michigan.
Kennedy suggested federal regulators may have been prompted to crack down if tobacco sellers have started selling pipe tobacco - which is taxed much less heavily than "rolling tobacco" - for use in the machine.
Kennedy said he personally doesn't believe use of the machine - of which he's no great fan, feeling people are better off truly "rolling their own" at home - should qualify as illegal cigarette manufacturing. He insisted, however, that "my opinion as to the legality of it is really irrelevant," as the issue ultimately will be decided by government regulators and courts.
"It's really walking a thin line, letting customers into a commercial establishment to use a vending machine," Kennedy suggested. He stressed that if the government doesinsist that the use of the rolling machine is a crime, it's a major offense. "Cigarette manufacturing without a license is a very, very serious crime," he noted. "It's a very big deal, legally and financially."
How absurd.... Essentially, they're splitting hairs now.
The only difference between buying your own hand-held roller and paying to use the machine is that it's easier, quicker and cheaper. The same components are present, without any danger to the customer or staff.
So why is the government sticking it's nose so far into the business of citizens and business owners in southeastern Ohio. Haven't they done enough to bother an area of hard working, yet impoverished people?
How absurd.
The goverment has gone to far! The time it takes to roll a pack is less then 15 minute and machines sell for under $60.00. The money they are taxing is only increasing the politicians pay: not our country. Just like prohibition, people will find a way around an unfair small minded conservative law!! No one has the right to force some one to their beliefs!
The gov has to get theirs dont ya know.
IT'S "WE THE PEOPLE"----NOT ---"WE THE GOVERNMENT"
I WAS ROLLING MY CIGARETTS WITH THE MACHINE---NOBODY WAS MANUFACTURING THEM!! OHIO HAS LOST SO MUCH--NOW, ONE MORE SLAP IN THE FACE AND BY WHO? WHAT ABOUT THE SMALL BUSINESS OWNER? DOES ANYONE CARE? GUESS NOT!!!
Well, maybe the poor people should STOP WASTING MONEY ON TOBACCO PRODUCTS, PERIOD! Someone might as well flush $5.00 down the toilet everyday and then stick their face in a plastic bag of asbestos and huff it in. No difference. It's funny how someone's "rights" are impinged upon when it comes to the expense of others or making money on them.