whats_happening_qr.jpg

events_sidebar_calendar_header.gif


11_treelighting_header_30x6.jpg

community_header.jpg
visitors_guide.jpg
annual_manual.jpg
best_of_athens_1.jpg
lodging_guide.jpg
bridal_guide_1.jpg
announcements_1.jpg

SoA_Anews_ad.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Local NEWS /  Developer says he didn’t do wrong
. . . . . . .
Thursday, August 26,2010

Developer says he didn’t do wrong

By Jim Phillips
Area developer James Brent Hayes has denied a number of the chief allegations in a lawsuit that was filed against him by the Ohio Attorney General on behalf of the state EPA.

The suit, filed in Athens County Common Pleas Court in June, alleged that Hayes has repeatedly violated state law, including water pollution regulations, at four different construction sites in Athens and Vinton counties.

In an answer filed Aug. 18, Hayes' attorney, Frederick L. Oremus, wrote that Hayes and his company, J.B. Hayes Excavating and Pipeline, Inc., "specifically deny" some of the most central claims in the EPA suit.

Allegations in the original complaint that the defendants have specifically denied include claims that they:

  • Engaged in earth-moving activities at the four sites "in such a manner that they have created and are creating risks to human health and the environment, and have violated Ohio's Water Pollution Control Laws";
  • Installed sewage-treatment systems in four buildings at a site on U.S. Rt. 50 east, outside Athens, though they had a permit to install for only one of the four buildings;
  • Put in the treatment system, in the one building for which they did have an installation permit, in a manner not in accordance with that permit; and
  • Violated final findings and an order from the EPA director, which they had agreed to follow in December 2004. They did so, according to the EPA, by failing to either pay a $52,500 civil penalty, or as an alternative, to enter into a conservation easement agreement by March 2005.

In addition, the answer to the lawsuit specifically denied a sentence that stated simply: "Defendant J.B. Hayes Excavating & Pipeline, Inc., is a commercial and residential real-estate development company that has been incorporated under the laws of the state of Ohio since April 23, 1986."

The defendants also denied a paragraph that said Hayes is owner and president of the corporation, and that "by virtue of his position" with the company, took part in and/or ordered the allegedly illegal actions referenced in the EPA suit.

"In addition or in the alternative," this paragraph had alleged, Hayes "knew about or should have known about these violations and, by himself or in conjunction with others, had the authority to prevent or stop these violations but failed to exercise his authority to do so."

This paragraph, specifically denied by the defendants, also claimed that Hayes is personally liable for the alleged violations.

The EPA suit dealt with four construction sites: the Hayes Professional Building Site on U.S. Rt. 33 in Dover Township; the Harmony Road borrow pit site in Canaan Township; the Hamden Elementary School borrow pit site in Vinton County; and the four-building site on Rt. 50.

The answer to the lawsuit denied sections in the complaint that had asserted, regarding each of the first three sites, that the defendants were the owners and/or developers of the sites, and that runoff from the site flows into "waters of the state" in each case (thus presumably triggering state water pollution laws).

The answer admitted, however, that Hayes and his company were the owners and/or developers and/or operators in the case of the fourth site on Rt. 50.

Regarding the first three sites, the answer denied in each case that the defendants engaged in construction activities at the site, disturbing land, without first having the proper stormwater-related permit coverage from the state to do so.

Hayes also denied in connection with each site that he broke state laws regarding water pollution control, violation of which leaves the offender liable for a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per day, per violation.

Regarding the Rt. 50 site, the answer specifically denied that the defendants installed sewage treatment systems without proper permitting another offense that carries a $10,000 per-day, per-violation civil penalty.

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
 

 
 
Close
Close
Close