whats_happening_qr.jpg

events_sidebar_calendar_header.gif




community_header.jpg
visitors_guide.jpg
annual_manual.jpg
best_of_athens_1.jpg
lodging_guide.jpg
bridal_guide_1.jpg
announcements_1.jpg

SoA_Anews_ad.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Editorial / Commentary /  Breaking the Sound Barrier
. . . . . . .
Monday, June 7,2010

Breaking the Sound Barrier

 
The anger is palpable across the Mississippi Delta. As the Deepwater Horizon oil geyser, almost a mile underwater, continues unabated, the brunt of this, the largest environmental catastrophe in United States history, is rolling onto the coast, impacting the ecology, the economy and entire ways of life. In memory of all that is lost

By Amy Goodman
Athens NEWS Contributor

NEW ORLEANS — The anger is palpable across the Mississippi Delta. As the Deepwater Horizon oil geyser, almost a mile underwater, continues unabated, the brunt of this, the largest environmental catastrophe in United States history, is rolling onto the coast, impacting the ecology, the economy and entire ways of life.

I traveled across the bayous and towns of coastal Louisiana for four days, meeting the people on the front lines of the onrush of BP’s oil slick. h ey are angry, out of work, and read the papers about people getting sick.

One person, whose job remains intact — at least so far — is BP’s CEO, Tony Hayward. Hayward, who was paid more than $4.5 million in 2009, lamented Sunday: “h ere’s no one who wants this thing over more than I do. You know, I’d like my life back.” Hayward becomes more vilii ed with almost each of his utterances, which are clearly aimed at minimizing the perceived impact of the BP disaster. He will probably be increasingly guarded in his remarks, as U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder just toured the area and, in a public statement, said: “We must also ensure that anyone found responsible for this spill is held accountable. h at means enforcing the appropriate civil — and if warranted, criminal — authorities to the full extent of the law.”

On Grand Isle, we met Dean Blanchard, who owns the largest shrimp business in the area. He took us out on his boat, where he expressed his strong feelings about President Barack Obama: “I thought he was a man of the people, that he would’ve come out and met the businesses that are suf ering, and look at us, and tell us, give us a little assurance that he would help us, but he just hid by the Coast Guard station like all the other presidents.” Blanchard’s parents and grandparents were shrimpers. With his strong Cajun accent, he explained the effect of the tides on the oil:

“I made my living of of watching tides. We hunt shrimp. You can’t see a shrimp. You know how we know where the shrimp’s at? Because of the tides. When the tide goes out, the more water goes out, the more water comes back, and when it comes back, it brings everything with it. It usually brings the shrimp, but this time it’s going to be bringing the oil.”

Blanchard says Fishermen are like farmers: “We lose money in January, February, March and April, preparing to harvest our crop in May, June and July. So we spend a lot of money preparing to get to May.” When the Deepwater Horizon exploded April 20, thousands of i sherfolk, their families, and the businesses and communities that depend on them saw their annual income disappear, with bleak prospects. Many shrimpboat owners have now been hired by BP to work on the cleanup. One local i sherman, John Wunstell Jr., was rushed to the hospital with respiratory problems that he attributed to the noxious environment.

He and others claim BP has prohibited the use of masks, and he has i led a request for an injunction to force BP to provide masks and other protective gear to cleanup workers. h e response of BP’s Hayward? “I’m sure they were genuinely ill, but whether it was anything to do with dispersants and oil, whether it was food poisoning or some other reason for them being ill... It’s one of the big issues of keeping the army operating. You know, armies march on their stomachs.”

Blanchard was enraged. Why, he asked, did BP coni scate the clothing of their workers once they donned hospital gowns? He said: “I don’t think you need people’s clothes to test for food poisoning. You’d only need people’s clothes to test for chemical poisoning.”

Blanchard took us out into the Gulf to see the skimming operations. None of the boat owners would talk to us. Blanchard explained, “h ey’re scared to talk, and they’re scared to be seen, because BP has threatened them that if they talk to the media, they’re going to be i red.”

One fisherman, Glenn Swit , whom we met in Buras, La., conifrmed that he signed a contract with a clause stating that speaking to the media was grounds for termination. When I asked him why, then, he was talking to me, he said: “I don’t feel it’s the right thing to shut somebody up. We’re supposed to live in the United States, and we’re supposed to have freedom of speech.”

Down the road from Blanchard, a family has erected 101 crosses in their front yard, each one commemorating something they love, like “brown pelicans,” “beach sunsets” and “sand between the toes.” h e sign next to the cemetery of dreams reads, “In memory of all that is lost, courtesy of BP and our federal government.” (c) 2010 Amy Goodman. Distributed by King Features Syndicate

Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.

Amy Goodman is the host of “Democracy Now!,” a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 800 stations in North America. She is the author of “Breaking the Sound Barrier,” recently released in paperback and now a New York Times best-seller.

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I don't waste time and emotional energy with the four letter word known as hate. The "H" feeling is not even in my emotional suitcase. My philosophy in life is LOVE EVERYONE. We should love our enemies the most. Part of my reason for being in A PARTY for ALL is because I LOVE Democrats and truly believe the Athens County Democrats could be led by a leader who also carries LOVE. I am running for State Central Committee because this district deserves to have a strong relationship with the State Party Chair which our current leadership was not able to foster. We can do better! Just because I choose not to follow a group because the leader follows a different ethical and emotional code, does not mean I carry anything but love for them, only think their time and energy could best be used elsewhere and mine too if they remain in charge. I don't carry hate with me anywhere! That's why I am such an optimistic person! Susan Mitchell

 

Susan I have heard both you and Bruce with my own ears use the word "hate" when it comes to Susan Gwinn. I have heard you both use "hate" on several occasions. Have also heard you with my own ears reference Susan Gwinn's weight in a horrible way in direct hearing distance of Susan Gwinn. Now I understand when people do not like one another. That is the way it is. But both you and Bruce have talked about Gwinn in very poor taste in public. Fact My question to you is where have you been the last 15 or more years when it comes to local and national campaigns? Why is it that you have been unable to put aside your own "hatred" and personal agenda with Susan Gwinn and worked for the "public good" in the Dem party. The inability to put your own personal vendetta's aside and work on local campaigns for the greater good does not bode well. Why would the public think that you could put your own personal agendas aside and work for the people as a State Committee Member? When you could not do that locally? Do know that you worked some in the Obama headquarters. But as far as I have heard that was the first time you had been involved in a Dem campaign for a very very long time. Your love claim is hogwash

 

Susan I celebrate your willingness to step up to the plate. But I keep wondering where you have been the last 15 years. Are you really so unwilling to put in print how your anger and "hatred" of Susan Gwinn has kept both you and Bruce from participating in the Dem Party and supporting candidates by backing them with time, money and effort? Being able to put your own personal agenda aside to work for the greater good is important. But just do not think you have been able to do that with the Gwinn issue. Many of us step up to the plate by pounding the pavement for an endless list of Dem Candidates (Paul Wiehl, Zack Space, Terri Anderson, Sherrod Brown, Gore, Kerry, Jennifer Brunner, Strickland,) Some of us have worked on all of these campaigns plus many more. Have not seen you once working for any candidates . Many of us have made phone calls, petitions, hosting candidates to come speak in our town co hosting candidates at house parties, raising money, run out the GOTV etc. Really like you but do not see where one would get the feeling you are able to put your own issues aside and work for Dems. Just have not seen it.

 

A-News, next week: A Comprehensive Interview with Susan Mitchell, by Editor Terry hisself, with Feelings Wo-wo-wo-wo-wo feelings; on the relevancy of her run for Dem-Central-Com, entitled: I Love Everyone - Democrats, that is... Except the really, really fat ones...". ("You won't see anywhere where I've either stated or even mildly suggested that the stories themselves shouldn't be as fair and objective as possible..."

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
"Having said that, I think it would be a surprising and uncommon thing if the paper’s editorial opinions and story selection didn’t reflect the political and ideological perspectives of the publisher and editor. TS" Hummm... Pamphleteer or Journalist? Editor's note: Journalist. You and the author of the aforementioned letter display a stunning miscomprehension about journalism when you suggest that the owner, publisher and editor of a newspaper should not have influence over editorial opinions and story selection. Why on earth would a person want to publish a newspaper if he had to swear that he couldn't influence editorial opinions and the type of stories that appeared in the paper? The answer is, they wouldn't, unless their involvement in the newspaper was purely as an investment. I prefer the historical record of the great American newspaper, where people owned them in order to crusade for change and community betterment. I wouldn't want to practice journalism in the sort of sterile world where newspaper publishers, owners and editors were proscribed from influencing what appears in their newspapers. TS

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
As a "journalist" would "influencing editorial opinions" ever color your editorial vision so far that you would willingly slant stories or not report evidence damaging to personal loyalties or your "prime directive" of "crusading for change and community betterment"? I'd rather know that my local "journalist" has his ear to the track and is more concerned with getting the news right and shining light on corruption wherever it resides than "crusading for (hope and) change". (With all this crusading, sounds like you should be the one running for central committee...)

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
To your first question, no. I'm talking purely about op-eds and story selection. You won't see anywhere where I've either stated or even mildly suggested that the stories themselves shouldn't be as fair and objective as possible. I value good reporting better than anything, and care much more that a story is accurate and fully fleshed out, without axes to grind, than whether anyone agrees with my opinions. I despise the TV networks that flaunt their ideology, and then make no pretense of fairness or objectivity. This is an ethical priority for me, and just a practical one. I don't think that local readers have much patience for bias in their news coverage. -- TS

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Hocking Hick. The A News covered the Susan Gwinn episode so much that it had people's heads spinning. Way over the top. Clearly exposed the A News inability to be objective. Clear agenda. Both Terry Smith and Bruce Mitchell agreed on the Gwinn issue (have that on record) Susan Mitchell talks about "ethics" Total bullshit. When you go around town slandering the Dem Chair (lots of folks have heard both of them do this) "Ethics" bullshit Editor's note: Kathleen, you're starting to sound like a broken record, and I really doubt anyone's keeping track of your obsessive rants. At some point it would be refreshing for you to acknowledge that at the root of all our coverage was a series of news events and a pattern of bad behavior that justified all of our attention (and other papers' attention, if you had been keep track). You can continue to get personal, relating what people have told you in private conversations or emails, or that you overheard at social events, but that really doesn't do much for your credibility. TS

 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close