calendar_header.jpg

Athens County Fair Photos
CLICK ON IMAGES TO VIEW GALLERY

community_header.jpg
visitors_guide.jpg
annual_manual.jpg
lodging_guide.jpg
best_of_athens.jpg
bridal_guide_1.jpg
announcements.jpg

soa_300x100.jpg


 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / News / Local NEWS /  Chauncey resident sues village over public records
. . . . . . .
Monday, November 9,2009

Chauncey resident sues village over public records

By Jim Phillips

A resident of the village of Chauncey who has been a longtime critic of its municipal government has now sued the village over an alleged public-records violation.

Tom Baggs of Elm Street filed suit in Athens County Common Pleas Court Friday, alleging that he has been denied access to public records documenting water and sewer utility bills for the village.

Baggs claims in the suit that on Oct. 8, he hand-delivered to the village a public-records request for the documents, dating back to Jan. 1, 2007.

On Oct. 21, his suit states, he got a letter back from Maria J. Mirza, the village fiscal officer, telling him that the village couldn't produce all the records, because some were "either on a computer in the possession of the Athens County Sheriff's office, or, in the alternative, had been stolen."

He did receive a printout of records from June to October 2009, the suit says.

Though Baggs has since inquired about the village's public-records retention policy, the suit alleges, he has gotten no response.

Baggs has alleged that Chauncey has broken state law by failing to draft a records retention policy, failing to organize and maintain its records, and allowing some records to be removed, destroyed or disposed of; and has been negligent in its duties regarding public records. The number of records involved is more than 500, he claims.

The suit notes that Ohio law allows for a $1,000 forfeiture for each violation of public-records law. The suit does not do the math explicitly, but presumably this means Baggs could be seeking more than $500,000 in forfeitures from the village, if each missing record is treated as a separate violation.

The suit does ask for compensatory damages of at least $25,000. It also asks Judge Michael Ward to order the village to produce the requested documents, and to begin following state law in maintaining its public records.

Baggs said Sunday that he and some other citizens who are deeply unhappy with the village government wanted the records to see if they have the basis for a lawsuit over what they consider illegally high water rates.

"I (requested the records) in good faith," Baggs said. "My wife and I believe that the residents (of Chauncey) have been overcharged (for water and sewer) for a long time, since 2007... What I wanted to do was file a class-action lawsuit over the water and sewer issues."

Baggs said he has gotten opinions from three different lawyers who have all told him the village's water/sewer ordinance could be successfully challenged in court. However, he said, if he wants to do that, the billing records are crucial.

"We all thought we were being overcharged, and we don't have any way to prove it," he said. "The village destroyed the only evidence I had at my disposal."

He added that he takes no joy in suing an impoverished village, but feels it has to be done to hold village officials accountable.

"It's sad it had to come to this, but records have been a problem for years," he alleged. "This wasn't something we really take any pleasure in."

The village solicitor, Robert Shostak, said Friday that he hadn't yet seen the lawsuit. He added, however, that some of the records Baggs wants simply may not be available, and that if this is true, it could be a defense for the village in the lawsuit.

"If (Baggs) made the request (for the records) and the village didn't grant the request, certainly he has the right to sue to get them," Shostak acknowledged.

However, he added, village officials have recently reported that some records appear to have been expunged from a village computer, and have called in the Athens County sheriff to investigate. As part of this investigation, he said, the computer in question is now in the hands of the sheriff's office.

"We can't produce something we don't have," Shostak said. "And the Supreme Court of Ohio has never said, 'Make some records up and give them to people.'"


 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I think it's ashame that Mr.Baggs has filed this lawsuit and I think he has done it because of the village and FEMA making him come up to standards with him home and it his his way of getting back at them. If he thinks he is so smart why is he always taking his name off the ballet before election time. He tells everyone he is running for office and then the next thing you know he steps out.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
The defense proposed by the villages' own lawyer is that they can't provide the records because they are no longer available and may have been exponged (destroyed, deleted). In effect he is using the defense that because they are inept, stupid or criminal (or all three), they aren't able to comply with laws regarding access to public information. I hope if Mr. Baggs' lawsuit doesn't fly, this will at least be investigated by the state. How could they possibly deny wrong doing, considering they are using it as a defense against a lawsuit???!!! Their lawyer admitting that Mr. Baggs has a right to sue to get them doesn't help their case very much,either. So in summary. 1)The village is required by law to maintain the records. 2)The public has the right to request those records. 3)Village says at least some of the records haven't been preserved (see item 1). 4)Village uses this as a defense against this lawsuit as to why they can't make the records available to the public (again, see item 1). Sounds about right for Chauncey...

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
I believe very little that Mr. Baggs says in the article. He does not get his way then he sues, I just want to file a class action lawsuit, what does that mean? Your water and sewer rates are what they are. Either way, your lawsuit will cost the village money, money that will have to come from somewhere. Water and sewer rates will go up for everyone. Your amount of $25,000 is convienient, you know that at that amount the village's insurance company may settle without a trial. I hope you can sleep at night. Your Mayor Quit, your new mayor didn't get elected and now you are trying anything. let it go, you do not have the best interest of the village in mind. You saw a possibility to get something for nothing and are trying it, just like your mentor.

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
well i know for a fact the the water dept here in chauncey needs someone to look at the records....i have lived here for 2 yrs now and ever since i moved in my meter has been broke..i get water bills where ppl just come up with an random # and if they knew what they were doing then theyd know my # never changes has been the same for 2yrs now... but they still can charge be for this randon # they come up with...i think this village needs a major turn around!! this town is no place to live anymore we need to do something b4 our next generation is worse than the ones runnin the town now!>:(

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
So apparently not only are they not maintainung the records, at least in some cases they are actually making them up as they go. I guess Shostak was wrong on his point that they just can't "make some records up",after all. Of course,considering that they destroyed a number of records, there may be no way of proving that...again, part of the brilliant defense. Speaking of getting something for nothing, I'm willing to bet that a good percentage of the population of Chauncey lives on welfare, WIC,SSI, or some other form of government handouts, so I wouldn't be too quick in pointing the finger at who is looking for "something for nothing".

 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close