whats_happening_qr.jpg

events_sidebar_calendar_header.gif




community_header.jpg
visitors_guide.jpg
annual_manual.jpg
best_of_athens_1.jpg
lodging_guide.jpg
bridal_guide_1.jpg
announcements_1.jpg

SoA_Anews_ad.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Editorial / Letters /  On Mojave cross issue, Justice Scalia, VFW are both liars
. . . . . . .
Thursday, October 22,2009

On Mojave cross issue, Justice Scalia, VFW are both liars

To the Editor:

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is a liar. I hate to write that because I honor and respect the U.S. government and the U.S. Supreme Court, but when a government official and an ardent Christian such as Justice Scalia misrepresents what he knows as the truth, I feel compelled to call him what he is.

In a recent case before this country's highest court, Salazar v. Buono, in which the court considered the constitutionality of a religious symbol erected on federal land in California's Mojave Desert, the honorable justice said that the idea that such a cross doesn't honor Jewish and other non-Christian veterans is "outrageous!" As a Jewish veteran, I can tell him (and you, gentle reader) that such a monument erected on public land insults, rather than honors, me and my faith. If it were erected on private land, however, I would find it a beautiful symbolic representation of Christian patriotism and Christian patriots.

Filing briefs in support of Justice Scalia's perspective were: the Veterans of Foreign Wars (which originally erected the cross on land which it did not own), the American Legion and the Military Order of the Purple Heart, as well as several Christian organizations.

Filing briefs in opposition to the Scalia/VFW position were the Jewish War Veterans of the United States, the American Muslim Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Council and the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty.

If the VFW and its supporters insist that the erection of this central symbol of Christianity is not religious, I ask them to stop pretending that they are in any way patriotic. Further, I ask them to never again express support for the Ten Commandments in general, or for that commandment which requires believers, "Thou Shalt not Lie."

As a disabled Jewish Vietnam combat veteran, I insist on my right to call myself patriotic, and the further right to call Justice Scalia, the VFW, and their cronies, unpatriotic, two-faced, bigoted liars.

Eliot Kalman
Athens

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
The VFW and others say they believe that Jewish veterans are honored by this cross even though the decendents of those supposedly honored veterans say they believe their ancestor veterans are in fact insulted. Irrelevant, reasons the Justice, In being so honored, neither the involvement nor the acquiesence of the honoree is needed: The decendents of those so honored may be offended and claim that their ancestors are or would have been offended; being offended is not unconstitutional and that their ancestors are or would have been offended is entirely speculative. This cross honors Jewish veterans regardless of what Jews believe. Why isn't the VFW embarrassed to be associated with this course of reasoning?

 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close