whats_happening_qr.jpg

events_sidebar_calendar_header.gif




community_header.jpg
visitors_guide.jpg
annual_manual.jpg
best_of_athens_1.jpg
lodging_guide.jpg
bridal_guide_1.jpg
announcements_1.jpg

SoA_Anews_ad.jpg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Home / Articles / Editorial / Wearing Thin /  Manslaughter charge in drug death is overdoing it
. . . . . . .
Thursday, August 6,2009

Manslaughter charge in drug death is overdoing it

By Terry Smith

Athens County Prosecutor Dave Warren wants to throw the book at an Ohio University student who allegedly "œprovided" Eric S. Hansen with the magic mushroom (psilocybin) that he ingested at some point before falling/jumping out of a fourth-floor dorm window on April 28.

Hansen died after hitting the ground below Weld House on OU's South Green.


Warren appears intent on destroying a second young life, in order to press home his aggressive anti-drug program. This dovetails with his posting "mug-shots" of convicted drug dealers on a huge billboard on Rt. 33 near Nelsonville.

In a press conference last week, Warren, joined by the OU police chief and dean of students, announced that a grand jury had returned indictments for involuntary manslaughter and aggravated drug trafficking against James Tyler Wagers, 19, of Mansfield, in connection with Hansen's death. Wagers was a freshman at the time of the incident at Weld House.

If convicted of the manslaughter charge, Wagers faces up to 10 years in prison. He could get another 18 months in prison on the drug charge.

I agree that Athens County has a serious drug problem that's getting steadily worse, and that most of the public, myself included, supports aggressive efforts to combat it.

I also think that sending a kid to prison for giving another kid a magic mushroom is a gross over-reaction, and distracts from the more serious drug problems facing our community.

Most people I've talked to about this feel the same way I do. They wonder why Dave Warren feels the need to wield a sledgehammer in a case where the victim voluntarily ingested the illegal drug, and then, unaccountably, behaved in a way that the overwhelming majority of the people taking the same drug would not behave.

Consider the following situation:

A clerk at the local state liquor store sells a bottle of Kentucky bourbon to a sober-appearing college student with a valid ID. That student then gets into his car and drives around town. After drinking most of the whiskey, he drives head-on into a tree, killing himself.

I'm pretty sure the prosecutor would not be prosecuting the store clerk for selling the whiskey to the victim.

This is because 1) the clerk sold the booze in a legal transaction; and 2) he had no way of knowing what the guy would do with it.

Let's take No. 2 first.

Wagers, if he really did provide Hansen with the psilocybin mushroom, could not have anticipated that his fellow student would eat it, then fall out of a window. Wagers would no sooner expect that behavior than the store clerk would expect someone to drink a whole bottle of booze while driving around town.

But what about No. 1?

Warren will argue that what makes Wagers' situation different from one involving alcohol is that selling booze in a state store is legal while selling or "providing" illegal mushrooms is a felony.

That's a good point, though I would argue that it's not a good enough one to justify sending a kid to prison for a decade, especially considering he's being prosecuted for drug trafficking anyway.

It also ignores the probable circumstances of the alleged transaction between Wagers and Hansen, the campus drug culture in general, and the relative harmlessness of psilocybin when compared to the hard drugs that are a much more serious local problem.

The usual way that college kids get magic mushrooms (and this hasn't changed since I attended OU in the '70s) is that one student finds a source for enough 'shrooms to go around, and then passes them out to willing friends, either for free or at some nominal price. The next time they feel the urge to get high on mushrooms, one of the other students might be the one who obtains the drug and distributes it to his friends.

In the campus recreational drug culture, the line between drug provider and drug user is constantly shifting. The "trade" is typically informal and cooperative, and students typically don't think of it as drug dealing. Rather, it's looked at similar to going to get a pizza. The guy who has the cash buys the pizza, and then splits it up with friends, who may or may not pay him back.

Yes, I realize that psilocybin isn't pizza, and obviously can have harmful effects. But it's relatively benign when compared to harder drugs such as meth, heroin and pain pills, and is far less associated with causing injury than alcohol. Let's put it this way. If I saw a guy drink a bottle of bourbon, then walk out onto a fifth-floor balcony, I wouldn't be surprised to hear later that he fell to his death. If I knew he was doing psilocybin, however, I'd be shocked to hear that he fell, and would wonder what else contributed to his death.

I doubt Warren can make the involuntary manslaughter charge stick against Wagers. He'll have to be able to prove some cause and effect between the student ingesting the mushroom and falling to his death. That's not going to be easy.

That's why he should reconsider, and instead focus on winning a conviction on the drug charge. Otherwise, this prosecution just appears arbitrary and malicious.

 

  • Currently 3.5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
My question to you Mr. Smith is what if it were a local who did this would you feel the same way. My thoughts and prayers go out to that young mans family. Editor's note: I'm not sure what you mean. My daughters are "locals." But like you, I feel the same way about the family. What a terrible tragedy. -- Terry Smith

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Terry, I'm glad you like the store clerk analogy. Giving some kid hard time for providing a couple mushrooms is just wrongheaded, mean and stupid. I dunno much about Warren, but I do know that more than a few local attorneys and judges that practice in that courthouse have passed a substance or two back and forth over the years. We live in Athens, for Christ's sake. And local journalists too. Ha, Ive eaten mushrooms with some of them! But I dont suppose youve ever tried mushrooms before, eh Terry? As I recall, the A in A-news used to stand for 'alternative' Remember when the friendly A-news Dope Wizard used to offer you advice on which psychoactives were the ones to use and which were to be avoided? So enough with the boilerplate drug problem rhetoric, please. At least you're saying something, but we could use a little more of that old A-news attitude when the local prosecutor is trying to destroy the life of some guy just for supplying a friend with a dose of mushrooms. Which I know I've done, along with God knows how many other peaceful, sane and responsible people in this town. How bout you? Editor's note: I did some a few times but it's been about 30 years ago. My main issue with this post is that I can't figure out whether it's a compliment or a slam. If it's both, then what's the use? -- ts

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
The point of writing is pretty clear: get the manslaughter charge dropped against this guy. Terry, I applaud you publicly going on record as having taken mushrooms. That was what I wanted to hear, and this is the use -- to demonstrate that despite plant prohibition laws, normal, sane members of our community sometimes choose to temporarily alter their brains with psychoactive plants...and nothing bad happens! This is reality. Sending an OU student to the penitentiary for giving mushrooms to a friend makes no sense, given that normal people do this every day around here, without incident. He wasnt doing anything that reckless or unusual. Why not say it in the printed paper? I dare you! I took mushrooms and it was ok. Heck, maybe Bruce could too. Many, many respectable people in Athens County have. Whats wrong with saying this openly? If enough people step forward then maybe the prosecutor will realize that people in this town are not behind what he is doing. Then after that maybe you guys could (once again) take a vocal stand against plant prohibitions in general. Report on the lives torn apart by and the $$ millions squandered on incarcerating plant users. But now Im dreaming. the A-news of today goes along to get along. You might offend the Chamber of Commerce. sigh. O, great and powerful Dope Wizard, where are you when we need you?

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
"Bad trips"-- including jumping out of windows -- are a well-known side effect of ALL hallucinogens, whether it be LSD, mushrooms, etc. (One of the reason that popularity for these drugs waned at the end of the 70s; oh, there were the flashbacks, too.) Just because you used a drug and it was fine is not a rational argument for not understanding the well-known and documented risks of these drugs. Whether or not involuntary manslaughter is appropriate is a different issue; seems more like a teachable moment to me. But the claim that the student who "provided" these drugs could not possibly have foreseen a bad trip, or that we should be "shocked" that someone using a hallucinogen jumped out a window is simply uninformed. (And yes, there is documented evidence for this beyond the exaggerated/suspect CIA reports from decades ago...)

 

REPLY TO THIS COMMENT
Id bet, if you crunched the numbers, that you would discover that many normal and enjoyable activites people sometimes engage in are far, far more dangerous than eating psilocybe mushrooms. Some that come to mind...rock climbing, horseback riding, hunting, skiing, sexual intercourse, swimming, football. People die from all these things. Piloting a 2-ton automobile at highway speeds in rush hour traffic might actually seem insanely dangerous given the stats, if we didnt do it every single day. Point is, we take all sorts of chances living our normal lives, and sometimes people do get hurt. Its sad when it happens, but not cause to lock someone up. There is certainly an element of risk to using psychoactive plants, but exceedingly few people have ever died as a result of taking them. How many cases can you site, given the many thousands of people who have used this plant since Life magazine wrote about it in 1957?

 

 

 
 
Close
Close
Close